Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Date
Msg-id BANLkTim0qzMx5x6BbG5SKBUFDPXGYiCAbw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 June 2011 13:15, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Hmm, I'm not sure having the pid in that error message is too useful in the
> first place. The process was just spawned, and it will die at that error.
> When you try to debug that sort of error, what you would compare the pid
> with? And you can include the pid in log_line_prefix if it turns out to be
> useful after all.

All fair points. FWIW, I think it's pretty unlikely that anyone will
ever see this error message.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: reminder: buildfarm members need to add 9.1
Next
From: Radosław Smogura
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch - Debug builds without optimization