Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikv51occ+UHWAttuuNL7OEqz9FTJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: heap_hot_search_buffer refactoring
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Yikes.  I think you are right.  It's kind of scary that the regression
>> tests passed with that mistake.
>
> Can we add a test that exposes that mistake?

Not sure.  We'd have to figure out how to reliably tickle it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost