Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikVmX89=FaJwFvncxiZmOdr-2UbLw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Attached revision doesn't use any threads or pipes on win32. It's far
> neater there. I'm still seeing that "lagger" process (which is an
> overstatement) at times, so I guess it is normal. On Windows, there is
> no detailed PS output, so I actually don't know what the lagger
> process is, and no easy way to determine that immediately occurs to
> me.

Process Explorer might help you there:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653



-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Should partial dumps include extensions?