On 10 May 2011 17:43, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> It should be an anonymous pipe that's inherited by the child process by
> rather than a named pipe. Otherwise seems fine to me, as far as this proof
> of concept program goes.
Alright, thanks. I'll use an anonymous pipe in the patch itself.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
