Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikQevjsBMr8VOa=5j_aURcSe=XkRg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:44:23AM +0100, Gianni Ciolli wrote:
>> Please find attached v2 of the numeric-doc patch, which takes into
>> account your remarks. In particular, numeric limits are now correct
>> and documented only in that table.
>
> This version looks sound to me.  Thank you.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] found a very confusing and maybe outdated sentence
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5856: pg_attribute.attinhcount is not correct.