On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> I see Robert committed that one already. If there's a consensus that
> omitting the pid for committed transactions is the right thing to do,
> I'm happy to put together a patch. I think that is a better approach
> than trying to keep it after commit until the connection closes, but
> all of this is sufficiently minor that it's probably not worth worrying
> much about.
I couldn't really figure out why that would be better, but if there's
a reason I'm fine with it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
