Re: big distinct clause vs. group by - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Uwe Bartels
Subject Re: big distinct clause vs. group by
Date
Msg-id BANLkTikNf0fnrrZfUY6SdUQuGKSpdR5AcQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: big distinct clause vs. group by  (Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi Vitalii,

this sounds promising, can you send me that?

Best Regards,
Uwe


2011/4/25 Віталій Тимчишин <tivv00@gmail.com>


2011/4/23 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Uwe Bartels <uwe.bartels@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> thanks for your answer.
> the aggregate function I was talking about is the function I need to use for the non-group by columns like min() in my example.
> There are of course several function to choose from, and I wanted to know which causes as less as possible resources.

Oh, I see. min() is probably as good as anything. You could also create a custom aggregate that just always returns its first input. I've occasionally wished we had such a thing as a built-in.


I've once done "single" grouping function - it checks that all it's input values are equal (non-null ones) and returns the value or raises an error if there are two different values. 

Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn 



--
Best regards,
 Vitalii Tymchyshyn

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue with partition elimination
Next
From: J Sisson
Date:
Subject: Time to put theory to the test?