Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby
Date
Msg-id BANLkTik99fyaQpGBOs1kMykUN=u93fTL=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby  (Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>)
Re: Re: database system identifier differs between the primary and standby  ("Deka, Rajib IN MAA SL" <rajib.deka@siemens.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:31 AM, rajibdk <rajib.deka@siemens.com> wrote:
>> What does that database system identifier means? Is it related to DB
>> transactions’ or unique to a version?
>
> Regrettably, it means you didn't follow the documented procedure.
>
> It isn't possible to do it any other way, so those questions are a distraction.

I think they are perfectly good questions.  If someone is trying to
understand how our product works, we should encourage that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Typed table DDL loose ends
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers