Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=zS8Lxutk_4n_i=Bgx8B+BuWVPTQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.  (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.  (Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> A wild guess is something like multiple cores contending for cpu cache, cpu affinity, or some kind of contention in
thekernel, alas a little out of my depth. 
>
> It's pretty sickening to think I can't get anything else out of more than 8 cores.

Have you tried running the memory stream benchmark Greg Smith had
posted here a while back?  It'll let you know if you're memory is
bottlenecking.  Right now my 48 core machines are the king of that
benchmark with something like 70+Gig a second.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.