Re: Pushing LIMIT into sub-queries of a UNION ALL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Pushing LIMIT into sub-queries of a UNION ALL
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=kf74TbkbZpxuFQmE_Y9yXpHizzw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pushing LIMIT into sub-queries of a UNION ALL  (Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Dave Johansen <davejohansen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using Postgres 8.3 and I have an issue very closely related to the one
> described here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-06/msg00488.php
>
> Basically, I have a VIEW which is a UNION ALL of two tables but when I do a
> select on the view using a LIMIT, it scans the entire tables and takes
> significantly longer than writing out the query with the LIMITs in the
> sub-queries themselves. Is there a solution to get the view to perform like
> the sub-query version?

I believe this is fixed by MergeAppend in 9.1.  You might want to try
9.1beta1 and see if that works better for you.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: FW: KVP table vs. hstore - hstore performance (Was: Postgres NoSQL emulation)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: SORT performance - slow?