Re: Partial index slower than regular index - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=izsG5SVwMW_28Dg2-0M__kSTg=A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Partial index slower than regular index  (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>)
Responses Re: Partial index slower than regular index  (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote:
> I'm using 9.1dev.
SNIP

> DROP INDEX indextest_stuff;
>
> CREATE INDEX indextest_stuff ON indextest(stuff) WHERE stuff = 'bark';
>
> postgres=# explain analyze select * from indextest where stuff = 'bark';
>                                                    QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Seq Scan on indextest  (cost=0.00..143386.48 rows=5606 width=9)
> (actual time=164.321..1299.794 rows=8000 loops=1)
>   Filter: (stuff = 'bark'::text)
>  Total runtime: 1300.267 ms
> (3 rows)
>
> The index doesn't get used.  There's probably a logical explanation,
> which is what I'm curious about.

Works fine for me:

explain analyze select * from indextest where stuff = 'bark';
                                                             QUERY
PLAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Index Scan using indextest_stuff on indextest  (cost=0.00..837.01
rows=13347 width=9) (actual time=0.226..6.073 rows=8000 loops=1)
   Index Cond: (stuff = 'bark'::text)
 Total runtime: 7.527 ms

Even with a random_page_cost = 4 it works.  Running 8.3.13 btw.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Kenneth Marshall
Date:
Subject: Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Partial index slower than regular index