Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=cnnGTs=wAZPyQDCC9E+aOHWHijg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> OK.  Please comment the crap out of whatever you do, or maybe even add
>> a README.  This stuff is just a bit arcane, and guideposts help a lot.
>
> We already have a README for that ;-).  PFA, a patch to
> src/backend/utils/misc/README describing the proposed revised API.
> If nobody has any objections, I'll get on with making this happen.

Looks reasonable to me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: small fix for Windows build
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensions Dependency Checking