Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=cL_wdUkbXt33+Lzr9J_cdzrJbsw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I can't speak for Debian, but the above statement is 100% false for Red
> Hat.  In any case, no RH system has ever expected users to issue pg_ctl
> start/stop directly, and I think the same is true for Debian, so the
> bizarre design wouldn't matter to us even if the case did apply.
>

that's right, the debian way is pg_ctlcluster

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation