Re: timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=Z49GhgU7BDjw+wT2ik2UFhrDoQQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: timeline garbage in pg_basebackup (was gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On tis, 2011-03-29 at 23:48 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> The line I marked in pg_basebackup.c might be an actual problem: It
>> goes through a whole lot to figure out the timeline and then doesn't
>> do anything with it.
>
> This hasn't been addressed yet.  It doesn't manifest itself as an actual
> problem, but it looks as though someone had intended something in that
> code and the code doesn't do that.

Do you have a ref to the actual problem? The subject change killed my
threading, the email was trimmed to not include the actual problem,
and it appears not to be listed on the open items list... ;)


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6 warnings -Wunused-but-set-variable
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance