Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=Wi+DsO5Bu1kYi1GL6rECAf8M1DA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.  (Steve Clark <sclark@netwolves.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:09:15 -0500, "Kevin Grittner"
> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>> Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> The new server uses 4 x 8 core Xeon X7550 CPUs at 2Ghz
>>
>> Which has hyperthreading.
>>
>>> our current servers are 2 x 4 core Xeon E5320 CPUs at 2Ghz.
>>
>> Which doesn't have hyperthreading.
>>
>> PostgreSQL often performs worse with hyperthreading than without.
>> Have you turned HT off on your new machine?  If not, I would start
>> there.
>
> And then make sure you aren't running CFQ.
>
> JD

This++

Also if you're running a good hardware RAID controller, jsut go to NOOP

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Glyn Astill
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?