Re: [PATCH] Fix that NOSUPERUSER implies REPLICATION unless specified contrarily - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Fix that NOSUPERUSER implies REPLICATION unless specified contrarily
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=Sq5GXpfSvnqpzn5qhNcFUXECT9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] Fix that NOSUPERUSER implies REPLICATION unless specified contrarily  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Also add some regression tests for that behaviour.
>
> Found after seing a report about it in IRC by Daniel Grace.

This patch didn't apply cleanly for me, but I committed the basic fix.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pg_regress multibyte -> encoding?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: GEQO-induced crash with provably dummy relations