Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=QLN_KGotrwkY8nXe8UOL_mQ8M+A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
List pgsql-advocacy
On 3 May 2011 19:02, Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can Unlogged tables be located on a table space mount on a ram fs
> without hosing the instance if the server gets bounced?

No more than anything else in a RAM filesystem.  There are of course
battery-backed RAM disk devices people can use, but those are a
special case.

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory