Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=OMNf_SUEVzt3+LuQyv17bfwZcNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Or you could just "unsetenv" instead of complaining.

+1 for that.

> I would like to think that eventually pg_upgrade won't start a
> postmaster at all, but connect using something more like a standalone
> backend.  So someday the issue might go away --- but that someday
> isn't especially close.

And +1 for that, too.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Standbys which don't synch to disk?