Re: getting to beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: getting to beta
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=8nAPcGebuCeU15jPe+N_++8_2jA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: getting to beta  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: getting to beta
Re: getting to beta
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 06.04.2011 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I agree.  But again, that's not really what I'm focusing on - the
>>> collations stuff, the typed tables patch, and SSI all need serious
>>> looking at, and I'm not sure who is going to pick all that up.
>>
>> Well, I'll take responsibility for collations.  If I get done with that
>> before the 14th, I can see what's up with typed tables.  I'm not willing
>> to do anything with SSI at this stage.
>
> I can look at the SSI patches, but not until next week, I'm afraid. Robert,
> would you like to pick that up before then? Kevin & Dan have done all the
> heavy lifting, but it's nevertheless pretty complicated code to review.

I'll try, and see how far I get with it.  If you can pick up whatever
I don't get to by early next week, that would be a big help.  I am
going to be in Santa Clara next week for the MySQL conference (don't
worry, I'll be talking about PostgreSQL!) and that's going to cut into
my time quite a bit.  The one I'm most worried about is "SSI: three
different HTABs contend for shared memory in a free-for-all" - because
there's no patch for that yet, and I am wary of breaking something
mucking around with it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: getting to beta