Re: Replication references - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers
From | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Replication references |
Date | |
Msg-id | BANLkTi=43UhMEUF0jMBR=g7k65N_dDg3ng@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Replication references (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Replication references
|
List | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 19:52, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Sunday, June 26, 2011, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 19:10, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:41 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:07, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >>>> > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 18:10 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 18:03, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >>>> >> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> >> >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 23:45, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>> >> >>> On 20 June 2011 21:40, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> Hi! >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> I know we've had some discussions around what to do with the Slony >>>> >> >>>> support.. But it's there now, and IIRC the deal was we keep it. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> That was the deal. FWIW, I consider our Slony support to be less than >>>> >> >>> useless, in that it is basically a GUI analogue to writing a long >>>> >> >>> Slonik script full of apparently redundant entries. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>>> I would, however, suggest that we rename it to actually be "slony >>>> >> >>>> replication" rather than "replication". Or "Use slony" rather than >>>> >> >>>> "Use replication". Calling it "replication" without qualifying it >>>> >> >>>> causes confusion to many users (came across it with a client just >>>> >> >>>> today, and it's not the first time). >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> I realize we're fairly close to release - is this doable for 1.14, or >>>> >> >>>> will that fsck things up for translators? >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> +1 >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >>> It isn't that hard to translate a few strings into all supported >>>> >> >>> languages. If a translator isn't available to translate those few >>>> >> >>> strings (and they'd have to not be answering any e-mail for that to be >>>> >> >>> the case, and it will take them less than 5 minutes), that's likely to >>>> >> >>> be in a language that isn't so widely spoken - it certainly won't be >>>> >> >>> French or German. I'd be willing to live with a poor machine >>>> >> >>> translation for a little while for those languages. If someone >>>> >> >>> complains, the complaint is likely to be all we need to fix the >>>> >> >>> problem ourselves. >>>> >> >>> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> So, something like this. I went with calling the field inthe dialogs >>>> >> >> "Use Slony" rather than "Use Slony replication", simply because the >>>> >> >> second option is very long - much much longer than anything else >>>> >> >> there, leading to a lot of wasted space. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Comments? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > It should be "Slony Replication" for the menu and the collection >>>> >> > factory name, not "Slony replication". Otherwise it seems OK. >>>> >> >>>> >> Agreed. Actually I thought I had fixed that already :D >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > I would like to hear from Guillaume before breaking the translations though. >>>> >> >>>> >> Yeah, I was planning to wait for his comment before committing anything. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > No problem with me. We have no updates to the translation yet, so that's >>>> > not an issue. >>>> >>>> Ok, applied. >>>> >>> >> I wasn't planning to - do we really want to change the name of a node >> in a minor release? > > No, but weren't you trying to get it into 1.14? Oh. Crap. Yes. I need to pay more attention :O -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
pgadmin-hackers by date: