Re: procpid? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: procpid?
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=3nu-kbMu6+mErfnObOrD31n8Rag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to procpid?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: procpid?
Re: procpid?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Can someone explain why pg_stat_activity has a column named procpid and
> not simply pid?  'pid' is that pg_locks uses, and 'procpid' is redundant
> (proc-process-id).  A mistake?

Well, we refer to the slots that backends use as "procs" (really
PGPROC), so I'm guessing that this was intended to mean "the pid
associated with the proc".  It might not be the greatest name but I
can't see changing it now.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: tuning autovacuum