Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Date
Msg-id BANLkTi=07-6ehMDFpGdTPrqJ7z9VL-Y86g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> As a result of this, I've been insulted, told I have no respect for
> process and even suggested there was a threat of patch war.

Well, you've pretty much said flat out you don't like the process, and
you don't agree with having a firm feature freeze.  I think it's a
perfectly legitimate question to ask whether we're going to have to
continually relitigate that point.  This is at least the second major
dust-up on this point since the end of 9.1CF4, and there were some
smaller ones, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Next
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: Error in PQsetvalue