Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:That syntax is sufficiently unwieldly that few people will want to useit in real life, but certainly the backward compatibility problem ismuch less than with what Tom proposed.Well, we would still support positional arguments like $1 $2 etc, right?
That syntax is sufficiently unwieldly that few people will want to use
it in real life, but certainly the backward compatibility problem is
much less than with what Tom proposed.
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных