> On Dec 18, 2025, at 05:32, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
>> . While working on [1]. I added an enum-typed GUC
>
> I wanted to check the original issue, but the linked patch adds a
> boolean GUC (logical_replication_fallback_to_full_identity), I did not
> see enum mentioned anywhere in the diff, did you link the correct
> thread?
>
>> Ideally, such a check would run at compile time, but that would require parsing guc_tables.c with Perl
>
> Maybe you could compile a utility executable as part of the build, and
> execute it as part of the test suite?
Hi Zsolt,
Thanks for asking. The link was correct. While working on the patch, I experimented with multiple solutions, one was
addinga new GUC “default_replica_identity”.
For that, I defined a enum in guc_table.c, with items like:
```
“Default”, DEFAULT, false,
“Full”, FULL, false,
“None”, FULL, false, <== copy-paste mistake here
NULL, NULL, tue
```
I mistakenly copy FULL to the “None” line. While testing, I did “alter database xxx set default_replica_identity =
full/none”,and found that resulted the same. Mixing the fact that a GUC change doesn't take effective immediately,
sometimesneeding restart/reconnect, etc., I spent time tracking down the error, and finally identified the copy-paste
mistake.The experience triggered the idea of adding a sanity check. With this patch, such mistake will cause postmaster
failto start, so that a developer will notice the problem in the first place. That’s why I mentioned this could be a
developer-facingfeature, maybe put all code inside #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING, so that it won’t impact release version
atall.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
