On May 1, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> I would call them "gss" and "gss-sec". Or possibly "gss-enc". I think
>> that's a lot more clear than "gss-np" (something ending with -sec
>> is a
>> giveaway)
>
> +1
If we settle on gss-np and gss-sec is that a good compromise?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
