Re: Amazon High I/O instances - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists
Subject Re: Amazon High I/O instances
Date
Msg-id B9ABAC4A-5587-47EA-A72F-9BB80E0E1797@gtwm.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Amazon High I/O instances  (Sébastien Lorion <sl@thestrangefactory.com>)
Responses Re: Amazon High I/O instances  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
List pgsql-general
On 21 Aug 2012, at 13:32, Vincent Veyron <vv.lists@wanadoo.fr> wrote:


Since Amazon has added new high I/O instance types and EBS volumes,
anyone has done some benchmark of PostgreSQL on them ?


I wonder : is there a reason why you have to go through the complexity
of such a setup, rather than simply use bare metal and get good
performance with simplicity?

For instance, the dedibox I use for my app (visible in sig) costs 14,00
euros/month, and sits at .03% load average with 5 active users; you can
admin it like a home pc.

This is a general 'cloud or dedicated' question, I won't go into it but I believe cloud proponents cite management ease, scalability etc. I'm sure there's a place for every type of hosting. However I would be interested in hearing some experiences of PostgreSQL on an Amazon high I/O instance, given a client has just proposed running on one. If there are none forthcoming in the short term I may be in a position to provide some results myself in a month or two.

Oliver Kohll

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: Re: .Net/C# - How to use Entity Framework Code First with Npgsql?
Next
From: David Boreham
Date:
Subject: Re: Amazon High I/O instances