Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
Subject Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?
Date
Msg-id B90F43429775DA4E80ECABFB9E6BDC26159769FF@xmb-aln-x10.cisco.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
List pgsql-general
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Ringer [mailto:ringerc@ringerc.id.au]
> Sent: 16 October 2012 21:27
> To: Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow
> Standard?
>
> On 10/17/2012 05:00 AM, Will Rutherdale (rutherw) wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I was having a discussion with people at work about the Postgres object-
> relational syntax.
>
> What syntax specifically? Do you mean table inheritance and SELECT ONLY ?

Just the basic Postgres Object notation, such as CREATE TABLE ... INHERITS, along with related syntax one might use
withit.  The ONLY keyword would be part of that. 

People looking at Postgres might reasonably ask, what does its Object support do, and does it follow a standard.

-Will



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL training recommendations?
Next
From: "Will Rutherdale (rutherw)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Does Postgres Object-Relational Syntax follow Standard?