--On 28. März 2011 13:38:23 +0100 Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote:
>> But I think we can just call pg_table_size() regardless in 9.0+; I
>> believe it'll return the same results as pg_relation_size() on
>> non-tables. Anyone see a problem with that?
>
> Hmm yeah, seems i was thinking too complicated...here is a cleaned up version
> of this idea.
Do we consider this for 9.1 or should I add this to the CF-Next for 9.2?
--
Thanks
Bernd
