Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Date
Msg-id B8EDCEA6-830B-4EDB-80D8-A19570699F7E@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
List pgsql-hackers
> On 7 Apr 2023, at 17:04, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:

> Afaict the failures are purely about patch 2, not 1, right?

Correct.  The attached v6 wraps the interactive_psql test in a SKIP block with
a conditional on IO::Pty being available.

--
Daniel Gustafsson


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample()
Next
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Track IO times in pg_stat_io