Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Anoop Kumar
Subject Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
Date
Msg-id B4AF8C04F762D246A1E38EC5DFAEFC0B0379D5@blrmail2.aus.pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to changed behavior in libpq odbc driver  ("Scot Loach" <sloach@sandvine.com>)
List pgsql-odbc
Hi All,

Please find the patch for the other bug pointed out by Scot. (Thanks to
Sivakumar)

"Another difference is the "state" that is returned from SQLGetDiagRec
when a connection is lost during a query.  This used to return 08S01.
It now returns HY000."

I request you to review this patch as well.

Regards

Anoop

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-odbc-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Scot Loach
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 8:31 PM
> To: Marko Ristola
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
>
> Thanks for the clarification, Marko.
> I use ODBC 3.0, so it would seem that this is a bug.
>
> scot.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marko Ristola
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 10:36 AM
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
>
>
>
> Please check, but ODBC 3 should return SQL_NO_DATA, when
> no data has been updated.
>
> ODBC 2 should return SQL_SUCCESS wether any rows were updated, or not.
>
> So it depends on the ODBC standard, that the client program chooses.
>
> Marko Ristola
>
> Scot Loach wrote:
>
> >I'm not sure whether the old driver or the new one is correct.
> >
> >When executing an UPDATE query with a WHERE clause, if the WHERE
clause
> does not match any rows, the old driver returns SQL_NO_DATA.  The new
> driver returns SQL_SUCCESS.
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> >       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> >       match
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Attachment

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: "Anoop Kumar"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode support
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode support