RE: Linux for S/390 Patches - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Neale.Ferguson@SoftwareAG-USA.com
Subject RE: Linux for S/390 Patches
Date
Msg-id B48FCF558294D311ADD90080C8FAF3F8013324E8@sunshine.softwareag-usa.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Linux for S/390 Patches  (Neale.Ferguson@softwareAG-usa.com)
List pgsql-ports

config.guess comes back with s390-ibm-linux so s390 would be the choice for processor.

I'll attempt to track the differences down and get back to you.

-----Original Message-----
We list platforms by "OS" and "Processor". What would be the correct
entries for S/390? Presumably S/390 is the processor, but I'm not
familiar with how IBM does their labeling...
:
:
I'll guess that the inet failures are due to differences in bit-shifting
behavior when generating masks. Will you have time to look at it? You
are probably already familiar with the tree, but if not look in
src/backend/utils/adt/ for the inet support.

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: "anuj khanna"
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL with Win98/NT
Next
From: "W. van den Akker"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL for NT