> Here's an example of the value groups that were contained in the
> table:
>
> fax status:
> pending, active, sent, error
> department:
> office, accounting, it, legal, experts
> deadline type:
> official, unofficial
> ...
> Is it really advisable to put all these values into 70 separate tables
> with the exact same layout? I don't quite see the benefit.
You could use the ENUM type for that (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-enum.html
), although that works best if these values are really static. If
users should be able to edit them they're probably not the best choice.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
!DSPAM:737,4a17ca8210091499713462!
