Re: .ORG pavillions: Boston, San Francisco -- dealine - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Andy Astor
Subject Re: .ORG pavillions: Boston, San Francisco -- dealine
Date
Msg-id B319CFEC3B80D3408CA36F99ADE84094680AED@edb-dc1.Edb-net.EnterpriseDB.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-advocacy
As I mentioned to Josh Berkus this week, EnterpriseDB will not have its
own booth at LW Boston, either. We are happy to help staff.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 1:15 PM
> To: Josh Berkus
> Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] .ORG pavillions: Boston, San Francisco
--
> dealine
>
>
> > The other question, of course, is that I know we will have a number
of
> > PostgreSQL-sponsoring companies at both shows.  While I don't want
to
> > split people's attention at the shows, we found out at LWE-SF last
year
> > that being a "pod" in somebody else's booth ... even a PostgreSQL
> > Company like eDB ... significantly cut down on our traffic.   So I'd
> > like to coordinate stuff with eDB, CMD, SRA and Sun to make sure
that we
> > are neigher streching ourselves thin nor limiting our opportunities.
> >
> > Please respond quickly; deadline is February 17th.
>
> CMD will be part of the PostgreSQL booth. We do not see a benefit in
> taking traffic from the PostgreSQL.Org booth. As always we are happy
> to help in anyway that we can.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
> Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
> Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Williams"
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and Zend
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL ad images