On Dec 11, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Trevor Talbot wrote:
> I've actually been wanting this lately, for a couple reasons. One is
> reduced disk footprint, but the other is reduced I/O, similar to how
> TOAST helps with large fields now. (In my particular scenario, TOAST
> can't help due to small field sizes.)
I've wanted the ability to define different toast limits for a long
time (so for example you could say that any fields over 100 bytes get
toasted). I might be able to get sponsorship for this, if others are
interested enough to pony up $$ please contact me.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
