Re: [PERFORM] how to plan for vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [PERFORM] how to plan for vacuum?
Date
Msg-id B0FCD438-0712-4DEB-8D95-A922391DA9AF@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] how to plan for vacuum?  (Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Ray Stell wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:04:49AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> It really depends on the system. Most of our systems run anywhere
>> from
>> 10-25ms. I find that any more than that, Vacuum takes too long.
>
>
> How do you measure the impact of setting it to 12 as opposed to 15?

If you've got a tool that will report disk utilization as a
percentage it's very easy; I'll decrease the setting until I'm at
about 90% utilization with the system's normal workload (leaving some
room for spikes, etc). Sometimes I'll also tune the costs if reads
vs. writes are a concern.
--
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Recursive query syntax ambiguity
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: VC2005 build and pthreads