Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id B074213A-475A-4BF2-9042-7DAC11BB3A6F@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 10.0  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> In practical effect that is exactly what your proposal does.  You just feel better because you defined when B is
allowedto change even though it never should happen based upon our project policy.  And any rare exception can
justifiablybe called a bug fix because, face it, it would only happen if someone reports a bug. 

Why are you refusing to acknowledge the difference between features that require a pg_upgrade and features that don't?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0