> On Oct 22, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm or deny that this is correct? I feel like it is correct, but I'm no expert.
>
> What are you going to use the code for? I think that that context is
> likely to matter here.
I'm not exactly sure yet, but I'm thinking about storing transaction ids externally and then regularly poking Postgres
tosee which ones are aborted-and-no-longer-considered-visible so I can clean up my external list.
eric
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers