Re: [HACKERS] How to determine that a TransactionId is reallyaborted? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Eric Ridge
Subject Re: [HACKERS] How to determine that a TransactionId is reallyaborted?
Date
Msg-id B0242820-DDB3-4900-AF35-4A589D4E198B@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] How to determine that a TransactionId is really aborted?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] How to determine that a TransactionId is really aborted?
List pgsql-hackers
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Eric Ridge <eebbrr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can anyone confirm or deny that this is correct?  I feel like it is correct, but I'm no expert.
>
> What are you going to use the code for? I think that that context is
> likely to matter here.

I'm not exactly sure yet, but I'm thinking about storing transaction ids externally and then regularly poking Postgres
tosee which ones are aborted-and-no-longer-considered-visible so I can clean up my external list. 

eric

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How to determine that a TransactionId is really aborted?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14849: jsonb_build_object doesn't like VARIADIC callsvery much