On 1/7/16, 10:19 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Scott Rankin <srankin@motus.com> writes:
>> Any other ideas?
>
>If there's no lock waits, and the tables are static, it's difficult to
>arrive at any other conclusion but that the process is simply losing the
>CPU for long intervals. What else is going on on this box? Have you
>made any attempt to correlate the slow queries with spikes in load
>average, swap activity, etc?
>
>regards, tom lane
This box is a dedicated postgresql box, the load is running around 2-3 (on a 24-core box). No swapping.
I’ll keep digging!
Thanks,
Scott
This email message contains information that Motus, LLC considers confidential and/or proprietary, or may later
designateas confidential and proprietary. It is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above and
shouldnot be forwarded to any other persons or entities without the express consent of Motus, LLC, nor should it be
usedfor any purpose other than in the course of any potential or actual business relationship with Motus, LLC. If the
readerof this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.If you have received this communication in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy the original
message.
Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written advice include a disclaimer. To the extent
thepreceding message contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated otherwise the advice is
notintended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of
avoidingFederal tax penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or marketing of any transaction or matter
discussedherein.
