On 10/25/21, 10:18 AM, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:14 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>> IIUC this would mean that archive modules that need to define GUCs or
>> register background workers would have to separately define a
>> _PG_init() and be loaded via shared_preload_libraries in addition to
>> archive_library. That doesn't seem too terrible to me, but it was
>> something I was trying to avoid.
>
> Hmm. That doesn't seem like a terrible goal, but I think we should try
> to find some way of achieving it that looks tidier than this does.
We could just treat archive_library as if it is tacked onto the
shared_preload_libraries list. I think I can make that look
relatively tidy.
Nathan
