Re: "private" installation of postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Ribe
Subject Re: "private" installation of postgres
Date
Msg-id AEA5EF30-FC97-4DF6-88F6-E776B34826D6@killerbytes.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "private" installation of postgres  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:30 PM, John R Pierce wrote:

> for some reason, I'm remembering that last time I looked, there were places where this value wasn't being used.  but
thenagain, maybe I'm thinking of something else entirely different and am just confused.   wouldn't be the first time. 

Well, unless I hear definitively, I'll consider that something I need to test. Of course there's also an option to
specifythe default when building the source, I expect *that* should work, and as far as I'm concerned there would be no
problemdoing it that way. 

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rodrigo Gonzalez
Date:
Subject: Re: "private" installation of postgres
Next
From: Scott Ribe
Date:
Subject: Re: "private" installation of postgres