Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-yum

From Jeff Frost
Subject Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
Date
Msg-id AE47425B-AD18-499E-B4C9-208EBDA534B8@pgexperts.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
Responses Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?  (Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>)
List pgsql-pkg-yum
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:09 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading this:
>
> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/1444
>
> Any objections for switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? From packaging point of
> view, I confirmed that c-ares is available for all supported distros, but I'm
> not sure about the implications.

If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:

ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=1.10

Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?

pgsql-pkg-yum by date:

Previous
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?
Next
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer?