I created 6 artefact bundles and uploaded them to Sonatype staging repository as described on https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Uploading+3rd-party+Artifacts+to+Maven+Central. https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-266 https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-265 https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-264 https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-263 https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-261 https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/central_bundles-260 Currently they are in evaluation phase and not yet published on Maven Central. * The most important class jars are the official jars from the JDBC download page. * The javadoc jars are the same for jdbc3 and jdbc4, originating from the build/publicapi directory. * The source jars are the same for jdbc3 and jdbc4, originating from the 'org' source directory without test classes in org/postgresql/test. -Gerd -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Kevin Grittner [mailto:Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov] Gesendet: Freitag, 1. Oktober 2010 19:40 An: Bremer, Gerd; Albert Kurucz Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org Betreff: Re: [JDBC] Upgrade to 9 questions "Bremer, Gerd" <gerd.bremer@coremedia.com> wrote: > I do not feel comfortable to upload artefacts from a project I > haven't contributed to. Keeping such a repository up-to-date with current jars could be considered a contribution. > Having latest releases in the Maven central repo is important, so > I was surprised when I didn't find them. It's not important to everyone; quite likely just to a minority. Things in an open source project often get done by those people to whom they are important. I suspect that if you pull official jars from the JDBC download page, nobody will find anything amiss if you keep Maven central current. -Kevin
pgsql-jdbc by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
