Re: more anti-postgresql FUD - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alexander Staubo
Subject Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date
Msg-id ADA35E04-9E87-480C-8564-73898DF556CA@purefiction.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more anti-postgresql FUD  (Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews@supernews.com>)
Responses Re: more anti-postgresql FUD  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Oct 13, 2006, at 17:13 , Andrew - Supernews wrote:

> On 2006-10-13, Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net> wrote:
>> On my box (Dell PowerEdge 1850, dual Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 10kRPM
>> SCSI, Linux 2.6.15, Ubuntu) I get 1,100 updates/sec, compared to
>> 10,000 updates/sec with MySQL/InnoDB, using a stock installation of
>> both. Insert performance is only around 10% worse than MySQL at
>> around 9,000 rows/sec. Curiously enough, changing shared_buffers,
>> wal_buffers, effective_cache_size and even fsync seems to have no
>> effect on update performance, while fsync has a decent effect on
>> insert performance.
>
> Your disk probably has write caching enabled. A 10krpm disk should be
> limiting you to under 170 transactions/sec with a single connection
> and fsync enabled.

What formula did you use to get to that number? Is there a generic
way on Linux to turn off (controller-based?) write caching?

Alexander.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew - Supernews
Date:
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD