Re: Precedence of % - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Precedence of %
Date
Msg-id AC4B136B-0C3C-4D4D-AFE0-AFA62EA42FE3@myrealbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Precedence of %  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Precedence of %
List pgsql-hackers
On Jun 5, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Now that I look, it doesn't look like these operators are documented
> at all in the SGML docs, so it sure seems that removing them should be
> pretty painless.

I wonder what else is lurking around undocumented and unused? Might  
be some other nuggets just waiting to be discovered! :)

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Precedence of %
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we force dependency?