Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinxT4mDGRn0Jej_N3UGZYJ8V-qMupQcPa43ioJH@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Yeah, I had a private TODO about that.  I'd like to see if we can
>>> refactor the grammar to eliminate some of the duplication there
>>> as well as the potential for oversights of this sort.  I believe
>>> that USER MAPPINGs are missing from ObjectType as well as a bunch
>>> of other basic places ...
>
>> Are you going to work on this?  If not I can pick it up, at least
>> insofar as making the comment stuff work across the board.
>
> I'm still up to my rear in collations, so feel free.

OK.  I'll work on it this week.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with streaming replication, backups, and recovery (9.0.x)