On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:46 +0200, Silvio Brandani wrote:
>> The Slony solution could be a possibility but the production database is
>> 80 Gb of data with around 10000 transaction each hour.
> Slony (or Londiste) can handle that without issue, at all.
Bucardo, too. All three work on similar principles.
rls
--
:wq
