On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, I see. That's pretty compelling, I guess. Although it still
>> seems like a lot of code...
>
> I think there is a way to merge single-byte and multi-byte versions of
> functions without loss in performance using macros and includes (like in
> 'backend/utils/adt/like.c'). Do you think it is acceptable in this case?
I'm not sure. I'd like to get a second opinion from someone else on
which way to go with this, but unfortunately 2 or 3 of the main
committers are on vacation at the moment.
Does anyone else have an opinion on what to do about this?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
