On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> fsync()ing the file at shutdown doesn't seem too bad to me from
>> performance point of view, we tolerate that for all other tables. And
>> you can always truncate the table yourself before shutdown.
>
> The objection to that was not about performance. It was about how
> to find out what needs to be fsync'd.
>
Just a crazy brainstorming thought, but....
If this is a clean shutdown then all the non-unlogged tables have been
checkpointed so they should have no dirty pages in them anyways. So we
could just fsync everything.
--
greg
