Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Date
Msg-id AANLkTinp-nTjbEjD4=DEsf3cJ_7i1z9o=dXv86X+AqH_@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Ross J. Reedstrom <reedstrm@rice.edu> wrote:
>> Speaking about which, using Make rules to prepare your upgrade files
>> from other pieces means no development at all on the backend side.  You
>> can hardly beat that.
>
> Yes, from the backend-developer's perspective. But not from the
> extension-developer's perspective :-) And seriously, make is one of
> those things that is supremely capable of doing lots of stuff, but is so
> difficult to use correctly that everyone keeps reinventing newer wheels.
> Seems this one isn't round enough.

Not to mention the fact that make doesn't work on Windows, so any
extensions that rely on this will need hacks in the MSVC build system.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3