On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I like that better actually ... one less thing for developers to get wrong.
>
>> The attached patch appears to work correctly on MacOS X. I did check,
>> BTW: getppid() in the attached process returns gdb's pid. Poor!
>
> Looks good to me.
>
>> For my own purposes, I would be just as happy to apply this only to
>> master. But I wonder if anyone wants to argue for back-patching, to
>> help debug existing installations?
>
> Given the lack of non-developer complaints, I see no need to backpatch.
Well, non-developers don't tend to attach gdb very often. Alvaro
mentioned a problem installation upthread, thus the question.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
